Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anglen v. E.L. Powell & Sons

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 1991No. 71479Published

1DissentSimms, Justice

The opinion of the majority reverses the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court which found that petitioner failed to provide statutory notice of injury within the time constraints of § 24.2 and failed to show good cause for not providing such notice. From this, I must respectfully dissent.

The trial court determined that the accidental injury occurred on August 19, 1987, and that Anglen had not given proper notice of injury. The trial court also found that Anglen had not shown good cause for *1371failing to give notice. I believe that the record contains competent evidence to support each of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. McDonald v. Time-DC, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Oklahoma City v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. B.K. Daniel Motor Company v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API