Legal Opinion
Oklahoma City v. Alvarado
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 11, 1974No. 46728PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Justice:
This proceeding involves further review of a cause considered heretofore. City of Oklahoma City v. Alvarado, Okl., 507 P.2d 535. Factual background reflecting issues adjudicated are stated therein and need not be repeated. Pursuant to directions for remand, State Industrial Court set the cause for hearing and determination of the issue whether petitioner, herein respondent, had been prejudiced by reason of claimant’s failure to give statutory written notice of injury required under 85 O.S.1971, § 24.
The matter was heard April 9, 1973, at which time counsel were afforded…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norman Steam Laundry v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- City of Oklahoma City v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Capitol Steel & Iron Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Greis v. RounsivilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Howey v. Babcock & Wilcox CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Protein Technologies International/Ralston Purina v. HammockCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Anglen v. E.L. Powell & SonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Anglen v. E.L. Powell & SonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Anglen v. E.L. Powell & SonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Ruditys v. General Motors Assembly DivisionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983