Legal Opinion

Chase v. Ormsby

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1931No. 12886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This cause must look for its ruling to the misty subject of the “Conflict of Laws.” The defendant’s decedent was the owner and operator of an elevator. The plaintiff was injured by a fall of the elevator due, as is averred, to the negligence of its operator. The injury, however, was sustained in the state of New York. By the laws of that state the common-law maxim is followed that the right of recovery for personal torts dies with the person of the tort-feasor unless an action was begun in his lifetime. The action is brought in Pennsylvania, in which state by statute…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. JoySupreme Court of the United States · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. McIntosh v. General Chemical Defense CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API