Legal Opinion
Brown v. Paulson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 17, 2009No. Civil Action 07-0509 (RMU)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In what remains of this action brought pro se under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., and the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq., the defendant moves pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment on the plaintiffs Title VII claims of retaliation, race discrimination and hostile work environment based on events occurring after…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dorns v. GeithnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Saunders v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Saunders v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Ahuruonye v. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Dorns v. PaulsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.