Legal Opinion

Ray v. Oconee Naval Stores Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 17, 1940No. 13288PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

The bill of exceptions does not designate or otherwise show who were intended as parties defendant in error. Furthermore it appears that R. 0. Thompson, as administrator of the estate of B. R. Benton, was a party defendant in tile trial court and was duly served. It further appears that by reason of the warranties of title contained in the various mortgages and security deeds executed by B. R. Benton the representative of his estate is interested in sustaining the judgment of the trial court. There was no service or waiver of service of the bill of exceptions as to this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gehr v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conaway v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API