Legal Opinion
Conaway v. Scott
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 10, 1942No. 14291PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reid, Chief Justice.
This being a bill of exceptions to a judgment awarding custody of a minor child on habeas corpus, and no party being named in the bill of exceptions or shown in the record as defendant in error, and the parties in whose favor the custody of the child was awarded neither being made defendants in error nor served with a copy of the bill of exceptions nor waiving service, this court is without jurisdiction. Code § 6-911; Ray v. Oconee Naval Stores Co., 190 Ga. 402 (9 S. E. 2d, 632); Gehr v. Atlanta, 189 Ga. 701 (7 S. E. 2d, 264); Warnock v. Woodward, 183 Ga. 367 (188 S. E.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Warnock v. WoodardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Gehr v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Moore & Son v. Nesmith Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Ray v. Oconee Naval Stores Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Ray v. Oconee Naval Stores CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mauldin v. MauldinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- West Lumber Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Bodenheimer v. Fulton National Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949