Legal Opinion

Rudy v. Southampton Civic Club

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 23, 1954No. 3160PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, Justice.

Appellants, Manuel Rudy and wife, own a house and lot which they occupy as their homestead in Southampton Place Addition to the City of Houston. Each of the twenty-two. appellees is also a home owner . in the Addition. Prior ’ to the institution of this suit appellants had erected on the rear part of their lot a garage apartment as a separate structure from their dwelling house and had rented the same to persons other than members of. their family. Ap-pellees brought this action to enjoin appellants from using or permitting the use of their lot- for any purpose other than a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Curlee v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Hooper v. LottmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Green v. GernerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Hill v. TriggTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Southampton Civic Club v. CouchTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Jackson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Shaver v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Southampton Civic Club v. CouchTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Garden Oaks Board of Trustees v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API