Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cilley v. Lamphere

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 19, 1988No. 13133Published

1DissentShea, J.

In affirming the trial court’s conclusion that the Norwich personnel and pension board (board) lacked jurisdiction to decide the plaintiffs appeal and thus to order his transfer to the fire department, the majority opinion takes a much narrower view of the scope of the grievance procedure available to city employees than justified by the language of the merit system rules establishing that procedure. Rule XIII, § 2, of the Norwich merit system rules, provides that “[a]ll other complaints and grievances [i.e., those not involving suspensions, demotions or dismissals] which an employee may have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. MarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. State v. TedescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Meinket v. LevinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Thermoid Western Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API