Legal Opinion

Knisely v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1980No. 60077PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence and operating a vehicle with license suspended. Held:

1. (a) It is contended that it was error to admit testimony by a police officer as to the defendant’s intoxication after the results of the intoximeter test given by such officer had been suppressed. The defendant testified that he had only 2 beers. The evidence was offered in rebuttal of this testimony.

In Jordan v. Ensley, 149 Ga. App. 67, 68 (2) (253 SE2d 414) this court considered the admissibility of evidence of a blood test for impeachment…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Nunnally v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Mize v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Kellogg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Watts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API