Knisely v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
The defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence and operating a vehicle with license suspended. Held:
1. (a) It is contended that it was error to admit testimony by a police officer as to the defendant’s intoxication after the results of the intoximeter test given by such officer had been suppressed. The defendant testified that he had only 2 beers. The evidence was offered in rebuttal of this testimony.
In Jordan v. Ensley, 149 Ga. App. 67, 68 (2) (253 SE2d 414) this court considered the admissibility of evidence of a blood test for impeachment…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Nunnally v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Mize v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Kellogg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Watts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003