McKee v. Oconto National Bank

The following opinion was filed May 9, 1933:

Wickhem1, J.

The first question raised upon this appeal is whether the findings of the jury that plaintiff was not dealing with Mehlberg personally or loaning money to him, but was authorizing withdrawals to purchase bonds from the Oconto National Bank, are sustained by the evidence.

Plaintiff was a common laborer, sixty-one years of age, of very limited education. He had done business with the *353Oconto National Bank for about thirty years prior to the trial. He had known Mehlberg for about fifteen years, and was on very friendly terms with the latter.…