Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Alexander
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 26, 2007No. 06-CV-3844 (NGG)(RER)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GARAUFIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“Plaintiff” or “Commission”) brings this civil enforcement action for violations of the federal securities laws in connection with the backdating of stock options issued by Com-verse Technologies, Inc. (“Comverse”). At this time, the Commission moves to strike three affirmative defenses asserted by Defendant Jacob “Kobi” Alexander (‘Alexander” or “Defendant”), namely the second (failure to effectuate proper service of process), third (statute of limitations), and fourth (laches). For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BerryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WylyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Securities and Exchange Comm'n v. Patrick QuinlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Microtune, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
- Signalquest, Inc. v. Tien-Ming ChouDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.