Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re M & O Homebuilders, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 2017No. 01-16-00602-CVPublished

1Dissent

Evelyn V. Keyes Justice,

Dissenting

The majority holds that the trial court’s “Order on Defendants’ Summary Motion to Remove Invalid Lien” that removed a lien and assessed attorney’s fees is actually a final judgment because the Order mistakenly contained a Mother Hubbard clause and finality language that called the Order a “final judgment” that disposed of all claims and parties and was appealable. The majority holds that the mistake was not a clerical error but a judicial error that was discovered and corrected outside the trial court’s period of plenary power; therefore, the case was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re DarediaTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Harris County Flood Control District v. AdamTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Polley v. Odom, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  5. Polley v. Odom, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API