Legal Opinion

State v. Hanigan

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 17, 2014No. 20120718-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

ORME, Judge:

€ 1 Defendant Asgia Ji Hanigan was con-vieted on two counts of sodomy of a child and one count of aggravated sexual abuse of a child. He now appeals those convictions, claiming that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

T2 To prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must first "show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness." Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). When «: evaluating trial counsel's conduct, we "indulge a strong…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API