State v. Hanigan
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
ORME, Judge:
€ 1 Defendant Asgia Ji Hanigan was con-vieted on two counts of sodomy of a child and one count of aggravated sexual abuse of a child. He now appeals those convictions, claiming that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
T2 To prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must first "show that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness." Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). When «: evaluating trial counsel's conduct, we "indulge a strong…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015