Legal Opinion

Atlantic Greyhound Lines v. Lovett

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 10, 1938PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

The writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of plaintiff in a suit for damages occasioned by personal injuries.

The defendant in error has not favored us with a brief, and, therefore, that the case may be determined in accordance with the applicable principles of law, the burden of independent research has fallen upon us.

In this opinion we shall take up and discuss the questions presented by the plaintiff in error seriatim.

Question I: Where a declaration is based upon a carrier’s negligence in striking, pushing, pulling and shoving a passenger resulting in an injury, and carrier…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. AnchorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  2. Spaulding v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Ransom v. . the N.Y. and Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Layne v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Northwestern National Casualty Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin v. Edward A. McNulty and Walter Scott SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. Farish v. SmootSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. Skinner v. OchiltreeSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—Report No. 09-01Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  5. Helen H. Bullock and Grover C. Bullock v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API