Ransom v. . the N.Y. and Erie R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The law guaranties to every person the right of personal security, which includes the uninterrupted enjoyment of his life and limbs, of his health and reputation; and he who, by a wilful or by a culpably negligent act, deprives him of these blessings, or interferes with the full enjoyment of them, subjects himself, in addition to such public punishment as the law has provided, to the liability of making compensation in damages to the aggrieved party. While admitting these general principles, the defendant's counsel maintains that where the wrongful act affects only the health of the party…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Linsley v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
- Seger v. Town of BarkhamstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
- Morse v. Auburn & Syracuse RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by33 opinions
- Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Curtis v. . Rochester and Syracuse Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Drinkwater v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Tefft v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Garrison v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.