Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Conner

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 18, 2012No. 11-7589, 11-7601UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vacated and remanded with directions by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2Per curiam

In these consolidated appeals, Richard Lee Conner and Anthony Thomas Foye appeal the district court’s respective orders reducing their sentences pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and modifying the terms of their supervised release by requiring that they reside in a community confinement center for ninety days. We vacate the district court’s judgments and remand with directions to strike the added conditions of supervised release.

In 2007, Conner pled…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. DirecTV, Inc. v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Jori FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Jori FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API