Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Noga

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 5, 1999No. 95-3000PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:

The jury in this case found the defendants liable for infringing the plaintiffs copyright in a computer program and for violating section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). The district court entered judgment against the defendants, awarding both actual damages and attorneys’ fees to the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendants challenge numerous rulings of the district court. We affirm. In so doing, we endeavor to bring a small measure of clarity to certain “rather swampy” 1 areas of copyright and unfair competition law.

I

Plaintiff Robert Montgomery is the author…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Simplexgrinnell Lp v. Integrated Systems & Power, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. Holland v. GeeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Jesse Wright, Jr., A.K.A. Jessie WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API