Legal Opinion

Bondurant v. Owens

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 16, 1868PublishedCited by 5 opinions

CASE 93 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM FULTON COMMON PLEAS COURT. CITED— Civil Code, see. 125. 15 B. Mon., 604-5; Petty vs. Malier. 15 B. Mon., 73; Smith vs. Moberly. Revised Statutes, sec. 1, art. 15, chap. 36. 2 Bibb, 94 ; Allen vs. Sanders.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Williams

delivered the opinio» of the oodrt:

This whole case proceeded on the mistaken theory that it was governed by section 1, article 15, chapter 36, 1 Stanton’s Revised Statutes, 488, which is as follows: “Where the defendant in an execution shall have owned the legal title in any real or personal estate, and have created a bona fide encumbrance thereon, by mortgage, deed of trust, or otherwise, before an execution has created a lien on the same, the interest of the defendant in such property may be levied on and sold subject to such encumbrance. 1. The purchaser at the sale shall acquire a lien on…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elswick v. MatneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Moriarity v. VesseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
  3. First National Bank v. PettitTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
  4. First National Bank v. PettitTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
  5. First National Bank v. PettitTennessee Supreme Court · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API