Moriarity v. Vessey
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CITED 1 M. & B. Statutes, Act of 1838, p. 653. 7 Dana, 64-70, Goring’s ex’x, Sso. v. L. L. & T. T. Shreve. 7 Dana, 331, Swigert v. Thomas. 4 B. Mon. 143, Bronston v. Robinson. Revised Statutes, art. 15, chap. 36, 1 Stanton, 488. 7 Dana, 301, Stop v. Phelps. 1 Bush, 340, Sandford v. Farmers Bank. 3 Met. 194, Forrest v. Philips.
Read the full summary
CITED 1 M. & B. Statutes, Act of 1838, p. 653. 7 Dana, 64-70, Goring’s ex’x, Sso. v. L. L. & T. T. Shreve. 7 Dana, 331, Swigert v. Thomas. 4 B. Mon. 143, Bronston v. Robinson. Revised Statutes, art. 15, chap. 36, 1 Stanton, 488. 7 Dana, 301, Stop v. Phelps. 1 Bush, 340, Sandford v. Farmers Bank. 3 Met. 194, Forrest v. Philips. CITED Revised Statutes, sec. 1, art. 15, chap. 36,1 Stanton, 488. , Revised Statutes,' sec. 1, art. 13, chap. 36,1 Stanton, 482. 3 B. Mon. 33, Glen v. Coleman. 3 B. Mon. 580, Oldham v. Scriviner. 4 Bush, 663, Bondurant v. Owens.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HARDIN
delivered tiie opinion oe the court.
A. J. Bell sold a lot in the town of Ashland to Daniel Berberry, and took Berberry’s two notes of one hundred dollars each for purchase-money. Bell having afterward recovered a judgment to sell the lot for his debts, it was sold, and purchased by Moriarity at the price of seven hundred and seventy dollars; and, that sum. exceeding the debt of Bell, he executed his bond to Bell for the amount of his debt, and another bond to Berberry for the surplus; and, the sale being afterward confirmed, a deed ivas made to Moriarity by a commissioner in which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bronston v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1843
- Bondurant v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elswick v. MatneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Wood v. Sharp's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Pineville Steam Laundry v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934