Legal Opinion
United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 1, 1973No. 69 Civ. 200PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge:
The United States of America, petitioner herein, seeks an order adjudging respondent International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) to be in civil contempt of this court’s Pretrial Order No. 5, entered September 26, 1972. At a hearing on July 16, 1973, counsel for both petitioner and respondent prefaced their remarks with a statement of “How we got here.” The court too will adopt this approach and begin with a detailed account of the tangled and time-consuming events which have produced the present situation.
How We Got Here
Thé Background
On January 17, 1969 the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Appeal of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and William H. Timbers, Its General Counsel, From Oral and Written Orders of District Judge Arthur F. Lederle, Adjudicating William H. Timbers in Contempt and Committing Him to the Custody of the United States MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- United States v. George Gordon LiddyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Xerox Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- United States v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.