Legal Opinion

Hoyle v. Dickinson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 11, 1987No. 2 CA-CV 87-0175PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

In this case we are presented with the question of whether, under a subdivision trust in Arizona, a first beneficiary who has subordinated his priority to a construction lender can sue a second beneficiary for the unpaid balance of the purchase price after the trust property has been foreclosed upon by the lender. We hold that such an action may be maintained and that the summary judgment entered in favor of the first beneficiary in this case was proper.

In June 1980 plaintiffs/appellees Thomas and Jane Hoyle and Marineo Builders, Ltd. executed escrow instructions in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Lane Title and Trust Company v. BrannanArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Doss v. KalasArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Tucker v. BylerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Wayt v. WaytArizona Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. MaileIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mining Investment Group, LLC v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Anderson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. Matter of Noel R. Shahan TrustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. In Re Naarden TrustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API