Legal Opinion
AMERICAN BUS ASS'N v. Rogoff
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 14, 2011No. 10-5213, 10-5214PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises the following question: Can Congress constitutionally permit a federally-subsidized transit system to take the residents of Seattle out to the ball game? We conclude that Congress can, and we therefore reject the plaintiffs’ challenge to a Washington Senator’s effort to help her constituents get to Seattle Mariners games.
I
The Federal Transit Act provides that, as a condition of receiving federal funding, a public transportation system must agree not to “provide charter bus transportation service…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Robert Gordon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Intercollegiate Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- National Ass'n of Manufacturers v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Gillette Commercial Operations North America & Subsidiaries v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Cooper Hospital University Medical Center v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.