Doe v. Schmidt
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
REYNOLDS, Chief District Judge.
This is a class action challenging the validity of certain eligibility requirements for the aid to families with dependent children program (AFDC) in Wisconsin. These eligibility requirements are contained within § 49.19(4) (d) (4-7) of the Wisconsin Statutes (1969) which is at issue in this lawsuit and provides as follows:
“49.19 Aid to families with dependent children.
* ->:■ * -x- -x- -x-(4) * * * “(d) Aid may be granted to the mother or stepmother of a dependent child if she is without a husband unless she:
x •>:• -x * x x
“4. Is the wife of a husband…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Annie Taylor, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor, Dependent Child, Margaret Taylor v. Abe Lavine, Individually and in His Capacity as Commissioner of the New Yorkstate Department of Social Services, and James M. Shuart, Individually, and Inhis Capacity as Commissioner of the Nassau County Department of Socialservices,appellants. Rose Hurley, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Children, Doreen Hurley,et Al. v. Barry Van Lare, Individually and in His Capacity as Acting Commissioner of Thestate of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Saiz v. HernandezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1972
- Majchszak v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1973
- Doe v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
- Saiz v. HernandezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.