Huff v. State

Shulman, Judge.

Defendant was found guilty of driving under the influence in violation of Code Ann. § 68A-902. This appeal follows.

1. Appellant argues that the police officer who administered an intoximeter test to appellant was not qualified to administer such a test because his testimony demonstrated a lack of personal knowledge in the operation of intoximeters. It is asserted that the trial court erred in permitting his testimony and allowing the results of the intoximeter test in evidence. We disagree.

"Generally, the question of whether a witness has such learning and experience in a…