Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gleason v. Guzman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 5, 1981No. 79SC155Published

1DissentHodges, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The majority opinion, as I read it, holds that the trial court erred procedurally by granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment because there existed a genuine issue of fact which should have been submitted to a jury for determination. In my view, there was no genuine issue of fact remaining after the combined hearing on defendants’ motion for summary judgment *390and the plaintiff’s motion to set aside the release. Therefore, the trial court, after denying the motion to set aside the release, properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. It is clear…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Flatiron Materials CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. McCarthy v. EddingsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  3. Scotten v. LandersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. Rogers v. FunkhouserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  5. Forster v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API