Legal Opinion
Perez v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 7, 2012No. 11 Civ. 8655(RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Metropolitan Transportation Authority (the “MTA”), John D’Agostino (“D’Agostino”) and Oleg Olshanetskiy (“01-shanetskiy,” and, with the MTA and D’Agostino, the “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the amended verified complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) of plaintiff Ada Perez (“Perez” or the “Plaintiff’) alleging violations of Plaintiffs constitutional rights resulting from urine tests performed dur*433ing Plaintiffs employment with the MTA. Based upon the conclusions set forth below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morales v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Thompson v. Dc GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Volpe v. RyderDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023