Legal Opinion

Marx v. Merchants' National Properties, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

That part of the motion which seeks an injunction against payments of interest or principal on account of the promissory note for $225,000 has been withdrawn. The request for additional relief with regard to bonds deposited prior to April 9, 1933, is not incorporated in- the order to show cause and is mentioned for the first time in the reply affidavit of the plaintiff sworn to April 11, 1933. No such relief may, therefore, be granted. The only phase of the motion remaining to be disposed of is that which seeks an order requiring the defendant Merchants’ National Properties, Inc., to furnish…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lemon v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Bergelt v. RobertsNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Sullivan v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. Northside Studios, Inc. v. TreccagnoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Rievman v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API