Sargent County v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
Erom au order refusing to vacate garnishment proceedings in Sargent Oounty, McKenna,, J., the defendant has appealed. “The industries under consideration in the present ease are all pub-lie industries belonging to tbe state of North Dakota.
Read the full summary
Erom au order refusing to vacate garnishment proceedings in Sargent Oounty, McKenna,, J., the defendant has appealed. “The industries under consideration in the present ease are all pub-lie industries belonging to tbe state of North Dakota. None of them are private industries or enterprises, but, on the contrary, are public enterprises and businesses exclusively owned and wholly operated by the state of North Dakota in its sovereign capacity, for the- use and benefit of all the people of the state, — in other words, for a public purpose.” Green v. Frazier (N. D.) 176 N. W. 20. “There are…
1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.
Staiement. — The defendant has appealed from an order overruling a motion to vacate a garnishment. Sargent count}’ has instituted an action against the defendant to recover a judgment of approximately, $125,000 upon deposits of moneys made in the Bank of North Dakota, both upon open account and otherwise. At the same time, the county instituted a garnishment proceeding against some seventeen national and state banks, wherein it appears that the Bank of North Dakota has redeposited funds. To the garnishment proceedings, the defendant interposed an answer alleging that the garnishment…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- US Bank v. PLANTERS'BANKSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Curran v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wilder v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- State ex rel. Lemke v. District Court of Stutsman CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Paulus v. South DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- E. F. Fox, Individually and as of the Estate of Alice C. Fox, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.