Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Payne

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided August 24, 2020No. 4:20-cv-00730Unknown

1Opinion

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION BRIAN CANNON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:20-CV-730 SEP ) STANLEY PAYNE, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Brian Cannon’s application for writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2254.1

Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts provides that a district court shall summarily dismiss a habeas petition if it plainly appears that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. For the reasons discussed below, the Court shall summarily dismiss the petition as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Tommy Joe Stutzka v. James P. McCarvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Nat Levy v. Donald J. Ohl, William J. Knapp, L. David Green, and Merilyn HamlettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Jay Clint Crouch v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction Arkansas Post Prison Transfer Board Leroy Brownlee, Chairman.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API