Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Oliver v. Southeastern Erectors, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996No. 94-1645PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant accuses the commission of abusing its discretion in finding Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-3-09(F)(2) inapplicable,1 and refusing to consider whether Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-3-03(J)(l) was violated. We are persuaded by claimant’s second contention only.

To successfully assert a VSSR, a claimant must establish that his or her injury resulted from the employer’s failure to comply with a specific safety requirement. State ex rel. Whitman v. Indus. Comm. (1936), 131 Ohio St. 375, 6 O.O. 88, 3 N. E.2d 52. A requirement is sufficiently specific when it “embraces such lawful, specific and definite…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State ex rel. Kirby v. S.G. Loewendick & Sons, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Byington Builders, Ltd. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State ex rel. R. Bauer & Sons Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Quality Stamping Products v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. U.S. Tubular Prods., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State ex rel. R. Bauer & Sons Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API