State ex rel. Oliver v. Southeastern Erectors, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Claimant accuses the commission of abusing its discretion in finding Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-3-09(F)(2) inapplicable,1 and refusing to consider whether Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-3-03(J)(l) was violated. We are persuaded by claimant’s second contention only.
To successfully assert a VSSR, a claimant must establish that his or her injury resulted from the employer’s failure to comply with a specific safety requirement. State ex rel. Whitman v. Indus. Comm. (1936), 131 Ohio St. 375, 6 O.O. 88, 3 N. E.2d 52. A requirement is sufficiently specific when it “embraces such lawful, specific and definite…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- State ex rel. Kirby v. S.G. Loewendick & Sons, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Byington Builders, Ltd. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. R. Bauer & Sons Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Quality Stamping Products v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. U.S. Tubular Prods., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State ex rel. R. Bauer & Sons Roofing & Siding, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.