Legal Opinion

Jones v. Cullen

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County. H. B. Lindsay, Cb.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

These are creditors’ bills, filed October 28, 29, and 31, 1896, attacking a number of conveyances, made by Cullen & Newman to their various co-defendants, as fraudulent in law and fact. The property was attached and placed in the hands of a receiver. The conveyances attacked are as follows: (1) Trust deed, dated September 12, 1896, by C. Cullen to L. H. Spillman, on his household goods, for benefit of J. C. Cullen; (2) trust deed, dated September 12, 1896, by Cullen & Newman to L. H. Spillman, on a town lot, for the benefit of Arminta Price; (3) an assignment of notes and accounts, dated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. South Branch Lumber Co. v. OttSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Community Trust Bank, N.A. (In Re Coleman)District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2003
  2. Pan-Am Southern Corp. v. CumminsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1957
  3. Roberts v. Southern Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API