Legal Opinion
Colonial Dodge, Inc v. Miller
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1985No. 70660, (Calendar No. 14)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
This case requires the Court to decide whether the failure to include a spare tire with a new automobile can constitute a substantial impairment in the value of that automobile entitling the buyer to revoke his acceptance of the vehicle under MCL 440.2608; MSA 19.2608.
We hold it may and reverse.
On April 19, 1976, defendant Clarence Miller ordered a 1976 Dodge Royal Monaco station wagon from plaintiff Colonial Dodge which included a heavy-duty trailer package with extra wide tires.
On May 28, 1976, defendant picked up the wagon, drove it a short distance where he met his wife, and exchanged it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Colonial Dodge, Inc. v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Colonial Dodge, Inc v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by15 opinions
- Head v. Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kelynack v. Yamaha Motor Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Whitcraft v. WolfeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Computer Network, Inc. v. AM General Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- William G. Wilcox, D.O., P.C. Employees' Defined Benefit Pension Trust and William G. Wilcox, D.O., P.C., and Counterclaim (88-1008) v. United States of America, and Counterclaim v. Rubenstein, Isaacs, Bordman & Lax Corporation, Counterclaim Lowell R. Stuckman, Intervenor-Appellant (88-2194)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.