Legal Opinion
Cunney v. Bd. of Trustees of Village of Grand View
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 18, 2009No. 08-CV-9507-WGYPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge. 1
The plaintiff, Brendan Cunney (“Cunney”), seeks compensatory damages in the amount of three million dollars from the Village of Grand View-on-Hudson (the “Village”) for an alleged violation of his constitutional rights guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The Village moves to dismiss Cunney’s complaint. Although the Village labeled its motion as a motion to dismiss, both parties refer this Court to exhibits beyond the four walls of the complaint. Accordingly, this Court converts the motion to a motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cunney v. Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Cunney v. Bd. Of Trs. Of Vill. Of Grand ViewCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011