West v. Wells
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Glarh County. Action to recover the price of eight tons of hay alleged to have been sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. The answer is a general denial. The case is stated in the opinion. Defendant appealed from a judgment against him for the amount of the plaintiff’s demand.
1Opinion of the Court
Lyon, ,T.
The testimony on the part of the plaintiff tends to show that the hay, to recover the price of which this action was brought, was purchased by the defendant, and that the defendant did not disclose that he was making the purchase for and on the responsibility of another, for whom he was acting as agent. The hay was delivered to one Meeks, who was getting out logs for Mr.' Spaulding. • The testimony of the defendant tends to show that, although he had some part in purchasing the hay, he was acting for either Meeks or Spauld-ing, or both, merely as the bearer of messages from them,, or…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Small v. ChampenyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Jensen v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Alexander & Edgar Lumber Co. v. McGeehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Colby Cheese Box Co. v. LaabsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Heer v. Warren-Scharf Asphalt Paving Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.