Legal Opinion
Halberg v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided September 29, 1995No. A-3733PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Elizabeth Halberg was convicted of second-degree murder, AS 11.41.110(a)(1), following a jury trial in the superior court. In our previous decision in this case, Halberg v. State, Memorandum Opinion and Judgement No. 2685 (Alaska App., April 28, 1993), we held that Halberg’s first statement to the Alaska State Troopers was taken in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We remanded Halberg’s case to the superior court so that it could determine (a) whether Hal-berg’s subsequent statements to the troopers were tainted by…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- McBath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- Vent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003
- Forster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
- Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
- Noyakuk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.