Legal Opinion
Penobscot Nation v. Mills
District Court, D. Maine
Decided December 16, 2015No. Docket no. 1:12-cv-254-GZSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
George Z. Singal, United States District Judge
Before the Court are three motions for summary judgment: (1) the State Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, for Dismissal for Failure to Join Indispénsable Parties (ECF No. 117), (2) the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 120) and (3) the Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Penobscot Nation (ECF No. 121/128-1). As explained herein,1 the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART each Motion.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
Generally, á party "is entitled to summary judgment…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Penobscot Nation v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Penobscot Nation v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. FreyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021