Rookwood Pottery Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
For several yeai’s prior to 1890, the Rook-wood Pottery, at Cincinnati, had been developing the production of highly artistie pottery and, from a stage which at first was experimental and of the laboratory character, had progressed toward a commercial enterprise. In 1890, it was fairly established, and had become enough of a commereial success to be self-supporting. The enterprise, then a private association or partnership, had acquired patents upon processes, and had a registered trade-mark and a good will, in the senses that, under its trade-name and trademark, it had…
2Cited by31 opinions
- Crowell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Colonial Fabrics, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Lawton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Raymond Tank and Elizabeth Tank v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Loesch & Green Const. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.