Legal Opinion

Rookwood Pottery Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1930No. 5375PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

For several yeai’s prior to 1890, the Rook-wood Pottery, at Cincinnati, had been developing the production of highly artistie pottery and, from a stage which at first was experimental and of the laboratory character, had progressed toward a commercial enterprise. In 1890, it was fairly established, and had become enough of a commereial success to be self-supporting. The enterprise, then a private association or partnership, had acquired patents upon processes, and had a registered trade-mark and a good will, in the senses that, under its trade-name and trademark, it had…

2Cited by31 opinions

  1. Crowell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  2. Colonial Fabrics, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. Lawton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. Raymond Tank and Elizabeth Tank v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  5. Loesch & Green Const. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API