Legal Opinion

Raymond Tank and Elizabeth Tank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1959No. 13603_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNTON, District Judge.

This matter involves a tax deficiency of $11,140.63 resulting primarily from the disallowance of a casualty loss claimed by petitioners on their personal in*478come tax for the year 1951. The Tax Court upheld the Commissioner’s determination disallowing the casualty loss, and decided that the petitioners owed the deficiency. The matter is here on a petition for review of the action taken by the Tax Court. The stipulation of the parties, plus the exhibits and testimony below, portray the following picture:

Petitioners are husband and wife who,, since May 1952, have resided…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Fay v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Matheson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. A. & A. Tool & Supply Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  5. Rookwood Pottery Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Phillip Brooks BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  2. Thomas W. Banks v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. Louis GillissCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Southeastern Canteen Co. And Canteen Service Co. Of Toledo, on Review v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, on ReviewCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API