Legal Opinion
Mary Patrick Latham v. The Office of the Attorney General of the State of Ohio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 10, 2005No. 03-3830PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Mary Patrick La-tham appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Office of the Attorney General of the State of Ohio (“OAG”) and others. Latham brought this action against the OAG claiming that its termination of her employment violated both her First Amendment rights and the anti-retaliation provisions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on both claims. Because Latham’s position is properly viewed as a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Susan Fisler Silberstein v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Crystal Dixon v. University of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Lane v. City of LaFolletteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Lisa Peterson v. James DeanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Landon Lane v. City Of LafolletteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.