Legal Opinion

Reading Tube Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1974No. Appeal, No. 1382 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

James Scull, claimant-appellee, sustained an accidental injury while in the course of his employment with Reading Tube Corporation, appellant, on April 17, 1968, as a result of which his right index finger was amputated. The appellant and claimant-appellee entered into an agreement for the payment of compensation for approximately thirty-five weeks to the appellee. Thereafter, six operations were performed upon claimant-appellee’s hand in an attempt to remove recurring neuromas1 which had developed in claimantappellee’s right hand as a result of the injury. None of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curran v. Walter E. Knipe & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Wall v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Rosenau Bros. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Killian v. Heintz Div. Kelsey HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Gindy Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Hill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Litton Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. McGraw Edison/Power System Div. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API