Legal Opinion

Banks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 15, 1998No. Nos. 96-04267, 96-04270PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this appeal brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we have found no error affecting Banks’ conviction; however, we agree with Banks’ counsel that one cost and three probation conditions must be stricken.

The trial court ordered Banks to pay $100 for the investigative costs of the Sarasota Sheriffs Office. Section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1993), provides that the costs of prosecution shall be imposed “if requested and documented by such agencies.” At the sentencing hearing, there was no request for this cost by the sheriffs office and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Nank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Powell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meade v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API