Wood & Son v. Riley
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Walker. Heard before the Hon. Thomas Cobbs. The facts in this case are stated in the opinion. contended, that the deeds and mortgages executed by William Wood and wifé to the several grantees were for indebtedness prior to the indebtedness of Wood and son to any of the ap-pellees becoming due; that these claims'of the grantees and mortgagees were valid and subsisting and bona'fide; that they did not participate in any fraudulent intent even…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Walker. Heard before the Hon. Thomas Cobbs. The facts in this case are stated in the opinion. contended, that the deeds and mortgages executed by William Wood and wifé to the several grantees were for indebtedness prior to the indebtedness of Wood and son to any of the ap-pellees becoming due; that these claims'of the grantees and mortgagees were valid and subsisting and bona'fide; that they did not participate in any fraudulent intent even if such intent existed in the mind of wood; and that the evidence showed that Mrs. Wood paid the original purchase money…
1Opinion of the CourtTyson, J.
— -Appellees wbo were judgment creditors of William Wood & Sou filed their bill against them and the other appellants seeking to have declared fraudulent certain conveyances held by some of the respondents to certain described property. It was.averred in the bill that the said Wood & Son and the individual members composing it, were insolvent at the date of the filing of the bill, and had been for a long time prior thereto, and were insolvent when the various conveyances attacked were made. It was also shown by the bill that the. indebtedness to the complainants existed at the date of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Robinson v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Calhoun v. Hannan & MichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Caldwell v. PollakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Pollock v. MeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Gordon v. McIlwainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- London v. G. L. Anderson Brass WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Gamble v. Aultman & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Davis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- R. W. Allen & Co. v. SandsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.