Legal Opinion

Gamble v. Aultman & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1899PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from tire Chancery Court -of Blount. Tried before the Bon. John C. Carmichael. The bill in this case was filed by the appellees, C. Aultan & Co., as creditors of John Gamble, and seeks -to have declared void and annulled certain conveyances of property made by John Oamble to his co-respondents, who are his sons and daughters, on the ground that said conveyances were A'oluntnry -and made to hinder, delay and defraud complainants, aaíio Avere judgment creditors.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tire Chancery Court -of Blount. Tried before the Bon. John C. Carmichael. The bill in this case was filed by the appellees, C. Aultan & Co., as creditors of John Gamble, and seeks -to have declared void and annulled certain conveyances of property made by John Oamble to his co-respondents, who are his sons and daughters, on the ground that said conveyances were A'oluntnry -and made to hinder, delay and defraud complainants, aaíio Avere judgment creditors. The facts of the case necessary to an understanding of the decision -on the present appeal are sufficiently stated in the…

1Opinion of the CourtTyson, J.

The bill in this cause was filed to have declared fraudulent certain conveyances executed in 1890 by the respondent, John Gamble, to his children, liis co-respondents. It appears from the averments of the bill that Gamble’s indebtedness to the complainants •arose in 1884, and was reduced to judgment on March 22, 3.890. That executions were issued upon this judgment and returned “no property found.” The bill charges That the several conveyances made by Gamble to his corespondents were voluntary. The answer of the respond*376ents, which was a joint one, after admitting the existence of the judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Wood & Son v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Moog v. BarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Halsey v. Connell, Green & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Pan American Fire & Casualty Co. v. DeKalb-Cherokee Counties Gas DistrictSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Davis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Umphrey v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. R. W. Allen & Co. v. SandsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API