Legal Opinion

Sotomayer v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*863The plaintiff, a materials coordinator employed by a corporate affiliate of the defendant Bombardier Transit Corporation (hereinafter BTC), was allegedly injured when he tripped over a water hose while working at a facility used to perform maintenance and repair work on passenger rail cars owned by the defendants Metropolitan Transportation Authority and Long Island Rail Road Company (hereinafter together MTA/LIRR). The defendant Hudson Machine Works, Inc. (hereinafter Hudson), was a subcontractor working at the facility.

The Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the motion of BTC…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Nagel v. D & R REALTY CORP.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Esposito v. New York City Industrial Development AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Keating v. Nanuet Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rocha v. GRT Construction of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Baklous v. AmtrakDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  3. Hartshorne v. Pengat Technical Inspections, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Hartshorne v. Pengat Technical Inspections, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. McLean v. 405 Webster Avenue AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API