Legal Opinion
Baklous v. Amtrak
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 27, 2013No. 10-CV-2793PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge.
Nikolas Baklous (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action against Defendants AECOM USA, Inc., f/k/a DMJM+Harris, Inc., s/h/a/ DJMJM-HARRIS/AECOM (“AE-COM”) and Amtrak, alleging three causes of action for violations of N.Y. Labor Law § 240(1), N.Y. Labor Law § 241(6), and N.Y. Labor Law § 200, as well as one cause of action for common law negligence. Both AECOM and Amtrak filed cross-claims seeking indemnification and/or contribution. Amtrak moves for summary judgment to dismiss all of Plaintiffs claims asserted against it, pursuant to Federal…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Madeline E. Brown v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General of the United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wallace v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014