Legal Opinion

Sarver v. Orrington

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1989No. A89A1402PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Otto Sarver brought suit against Willard Donald Orrington seeking damages for noneconomic losses he allegedly incurred when his automobile was struck by Orrington’s automobile. The trial court granted Orrington’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of Sarver’s evidence and Sarver appeals.

The trial court granted appellee’s motion for directed verdict on the basis that appellee was exempt from liability under OCGA § 33-34-9 (a) because appellant had failed to present evidence that he had suffered a “serious injury” as defined jn OCGA § 33-34-2 (13).(a) Appellant contends…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curlee v. Mock Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Piedmont Aviation, Inc. v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Layfield v. Turner Advertising Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bartosz v. Chapparal Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API