Legal Opinion
Bartosz v. Chapparal Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 7, 2005No. A04A1848PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court should have granted a directed verdict based on an admission made by one of the parties. Because the admission was not introduced into evidence before the jury, and even if it had been it would have not have mandated a directed verdict, we find no error.
In 1986, Henry Bartosz, Jr., entered into a franchise agreement with Chapparal Enterprises, Inc., which owned a pest control business known as Cherokee Services. Pursuant to the agreement, Bartosz began operating his own pest control business using the Cherokee…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Golden Peanut Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Rowland v. TsayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Schafer v. Wachovia Bank of Georgia, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Brooks v. ROLEY & ROLEY ENGINEERS, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- National Bank of Georgia v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Patel v. Columbia National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Thomas v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- 131 Ralph McGill Boulevard, LLC v. First Intercontinental BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Vis v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- B. J. Patel v. Columbis National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.