Legal Opinion

Harris v. Carter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1929No. 6 Div. 368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The bill of exceptions in this case is practically a stenographic report of the trial in the lower court. It is in flagrant violation of the rule and must be stricken upon the authority of Turner v. Thornton, 192 Ala. 98, 68 So. 813, and cases there cited. The fact that counsel may have agreed upon the correctness of same, before presented to the trial judge for approval, was no agreement that it should be in improper form, though such an agreement would not be binding on this court. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Hall, 131 Ala. 161, 32 So. 603.

As the bill of exceptions is stricken, *and there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  2. Turner v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pate v. BrunerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Ancient Free & Accepted Masons of Alabama v. CallierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Factors & Mill End Distributors, Inc. v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Lone Star Cement Co. of Louisiana v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API