Legal Opinion

Yaselli v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 7, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEARNED HAND, District Judge.

The jurisdiction of this court cannot rest on diversity of citizenship, because both defendants are citizens of the District of Columbia. Hoos v. Jamieson, 166 U. S. 395, 17 Sup. Ct. 596, 41 L. Ed. 1049; Barney v. Baltimore, 6 Wall. 280, 18 L. Ed. 825. Therefore, if there is any jurisdiction whatever, it must rest, upon the fact that the case arises under a federal l'aw. There is authority for this in the District Court. Union Timber Product Co. v. Emergency Fleet Corp., 252 Fed. 320; Ingram Day Lumber Co. v. Emergency Fleet Corp., 267 Fed. 283; Harry Porter Co.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. In Re Keasbey & Mattison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Hooe v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Ingram Day Lumber Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1920
  5. Harry Porter Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commercial Trust Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Peters v. Detroit & Cleveland Nav. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API