Legal Opinion

Continental National Bank v. Folsom

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

- Promissory Notes. Indorsement. Notice. Practice in Supreme Court. Charge of Court. Verdict Before Judge HlLLYER. Fulton Superior Court. April Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Justice.

1. The Continental National Bank of New York sued Hape as maker and L. B. Folsom as indorser, upon a promissory note payable at the City Bank of Atlanta. Folsom, among other pleas, filed one setting up want of notice of non-payment and protest, as required by law. The evidence being in, the judge charged the jury, among other things, that if a demand for payment was made at the bank, and the same refused, and that thereupon the note was duly protested for non-payment, and notice given the 'indorser, as required by law, of the demand, refusal and protest for such non-payment,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Field v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Livingston v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Johnson v. SherrerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Bird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. McRae v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Little v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API